Flattening
Hierarchies? Thoughts on Collaboration and
Psychological Dialogues
That Clients Might Consider
Socially Just
Tom Strong University of Calgary (Alberta, Canada)
pp. 1-16
ABSTRACT:
For many
psychologists, social justice involves consideration
of social and cultural factors worth addressing
beyond the immediacies of their dialogues with
clients. In this paper, I examine factors relating
to the psychologist’s often asymmetric participation
in dialogues with clients. By asymmetry, I
specifically refer to the psychologist’s
professional authority exercised over meanings and
actions to be determined in dialogues with clients.
“Flattening the hierarchy” is a colloquial phrase
referring to recent developments from collaborative
action research and dialogic approaches to therapy.
These forms of research and therapy share a social
constructionist theoretical perspective, wherein
meaning and action is seen as negotiated. This paper
raises conceptual resources and actions aimed to
promote such negotiations between psychologist and
client, and the authority shared in them, in
‘flattening hierarchies’.