ABSTRACT.
Muratori & Maestro (2007, this issue) provide a fascinating
investigation into the possible origins of autism and how it may begin
to show itself during the first year of life. However, one could hope
for greater clarity on how the variety of hypotheses that they consider
relate to each other and to the origins and development both of autism
and of the dialogical self. In this commentary I support a neurological
hypothesis on the origin for autism and provide an information
processing account of the development of autistic difficulties in
social interactions and in forming a conception of the dialogical self.
|
|