ABSTRACT. The
commentary takes up some of Bamberg and Zielke's (2007, this issue)
points of discussion of the concept of dialogicality in the "dialogical
self", mainly their critique of building in the notion of dialogue into
the self. The status of the self in the "dialogical self" concept, its
origin in Bakhtin's metaphorism, and dilemmas in the narrative
constitution of self and identity are discussed. The main argument
focuses on the problems and critical aspects which arise when Bakhtin's
metaphor of the "polyphonous voices" is reified in the construction of
the "dialogical self". Furthermore, Bamberg and Zielke's notion that
narrators have to take a position towards three dilemmas of narrative
identity construction is questioned.
|
|