Teacher
Identity and Dialogue: A Comment on Van Rijswijk,
Akkerman, & Koster
Willem Wardekker VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
pp. 61-65
ABSTRACT.Van
Rijswijk et al. limit themselves
to a descriptive interpretation of dialogism:
they have analysed the form
of the student discourses, but they have given
scant attention to the normative
side. The question remains as to whether, for
instance, the students have
developed an identity that is itself prone to
either a more authoritative or a
more dialogical teaching style. It would be
interesting to see whether they
have developed an openness to differences, are
themselves able to ask critical
questions, can encourage the asking of such
questions by their students, and/or
whether they have a critical perspective on the
world of education. These
aspects are absent in the present analysis of
Van Rijswijk et al.